Marketing Messages and Consent Under the Saudi PDPL: SMS, Email and WhatsApp Rules
Under the Saudi Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL), you generally need the recipient's consent before sending marketing by SMS, email or WhatsApp. Article 25 of the PDPL and Articles 28 and 29 of the Implementing Regulations require that consent be freely given and documented, that every message clearly name the sender, and that recipients can opt out free of charge as easily as they opted in. For SMS, the Communications, Space and Technology Commission (CST) adds its own rules, including registered sender names and a 24-hour deadline to stop after an opt-out. SDAIA penalized marketing without consent in both its 2025 and June 2026 enforcement decisions.
| Arabic terms | المواد الدعائية والتوعوية · التسويق المباشر · موافقة المتلقي |
|---|---|
| Law | PDPL Articles 25 and 26 |
| Regulations | Implementing Regulations Articles 11, 12, 28 and 29 |
| Consent | Freely given, specific, documented so it can be verified; separate consent for each purpose |
| Every message | Clear sender identity and a free opt-out at least as easy as giving consent |
| After opt-out | Stop without undue delay (PDPL Regulations); within 24 hours for SMS and calls (CST) |
| SMS quiet hours | No promotional SMS from 10:00 pm to 9:00 am (CST) |
| Maximum PDPL fine | SAR 5 million per violation, doubled for repeats (PDPL Article 36) |
| Enforcement | Marketing without consent named in SDAIA decisions announced January and June 2026 |
What the PDPL says about marketing messages
Article 25 of the PDPL says a controller may not use a person's personal contact channels, including postal and email addresses, to send promotional or awareness material unless two conditions are met: the recipient has consented, and the sender provides a clear way to stop receiving it. Awareness material sent by public bodies is exempt. Article 26 adds that personal data, other than sensitive data, may be processed for marketing if it was collected directly from the person and they consented.
The detail sits in the Implementing Regulations. Article 11 sets general consent conditions, Article 12 lets people withdraw consent at any time, and Articles 28 and 29 deal with promotional material and direct marketing. Law-firm commentary (Latham & Watkins) reads these provisions as making consent the only basis you can rely on for marketing, rather than legitimate interest.
Promotional material vs direct marketing
| Article 28: promotional and awareness material | Article 29: direct marketing | |
|---|---|---|
| Consent needed? | Yes, where there is no prior dealing with the recipient | Yes, under Article 11, with no prior-dealing exception |
| Consent conditions | Freely given, no misleading methods; recipient can choose which messages to get; documented | The general Article 11 conditions |
| Sender identity | Clearly shown, nothing hidden | Clearly shown |
| Opt-out | At least as easy as consenting, free of charge, effective as soon as requested | At least as easy as consenting; stop without undue delay after withdrawal |
| Proof | Keep evidence of the recipient's consent | Consent documented so it can be verified |
The Regulations define direct marketing as contacting a person by any direct physical or electronic means to send marketing material.
Can you message existing customers without fresh consent?
This is the most common question, and the answer is less clear than in UK or EU law. Article 28 relaxes the consent requirement for promotional material where you already have prior dealing with the recipient. Article 29, which covers direct marketing, has no such exception. Latham & Watkins flags this gap as a source of uncertainty.
The safer course: treat marketing to customers as direct marketing, collect a separate marketing consent at signup or checkout, and keep proof. The October 2026 draft points the same way, since it would require controllers relying on an existing relationship to check that valid consent exists (Clyde & Co).
How to collect and record valid marketing consent
- Separate it. Article 11 requires separate consent for each purpose. A marketing tick box must be separate from accepting your terms or privacy notice, and must not be pre-ticked.
- Let people choose. Article 28 expects recipients to be able to customize which promotional options they receive, for example offers vs newsletters, or SMS vs email.
- Say who and what. Explain who will send messages, on which channels and about what.
- Record it. Keep the date, channel, wording shown and the source of each consent, so you can prove it later.
- Make withdrawal easy. Opting out must be free and at least as easy as opting in.
- Reflect it in your privacy notice. Our privacy notice guide covers how to describe marketing processing.
Explicit consent under Article 11(2) is required for sensitive data, credit data and fully automated decisions. Marketing is not on that list, but a clear, active opt-in is still the practical standard, and SDAIA's June 2026 announcement described the violation as direct marketing without explicit consent.
What every marketing message must include
- The sender's name, clearly shown.
- A free way to opt out, as easy as signing up.
- Content that matches what the person agreed to receive.
- For SMS, a registered sender name with the advertising suffix.
Channel rules: SMS, email and WhatsApp
| Channel | PDPL | Other rules |
|---|---|---|
| SMS | Consent, sender identity, easy free opt-out | CST Regulations for Curbing Spam: express agreement (consent buried in a contract or privacy policy does not count), proof of consent, registered sender names with the "-AD" suffix for advertising, no promotional SMS from 10:00 pm to 9:00 am (1:00 am to 12:00 pm in Ramadan), stop within 24 hours of an opt-out, users can block promotional SMS via 330330 |
| Consent, sender identity, easy free opt-out (email is named in Article 25) | CST's spam regulations also cover email | |
| Consent, sender identity, easy free opt-out | WhatsApp Business Messaging Policy: opt-in before messaging, honor opt-outs made on or off WhatsApp, approved message templates for business-initiated chats; Meta places legal compliance on the business |
If your marketing platform stores or processes customer data outside Saudi Arabia, the transfer rules in our cross-border transfer guide also apply.
Enforcement so far
In January 2026 SDAIA's violation committees announced 48 decisions for the previous year. The listed violations included sending promotional and marketing messages to data subjects without their consent. In June 2026 a new batch of fines and warnings named processing personal data for direct marketing without explicit consent as the most prominent violation. No fine amounts were published. The maximum under Article 36 of the PDPL is SAR 5 million per violation, doubled for repeats. Our guide to PDPL penalties and enforcement explains the process.
What the October 2026 draft would change
SDAIA's draft amendments to the Implementing Regulations are open for comment until 5 November 2026. Based on Clyde & Co and Al Tamimi summaries, the draft would keep consent where there is no prior interaction, require controllers relying on an existing relationship to verify valid consent, consolidate sender identity, unsubscribe and record-keeping rules, and require marketing processing to stop, with the resulting data destroyed, after consent is withdrawn. These are proposals and are not yet in force.
PDPL marketing consent checklist
- We list every marketing channel we use: SMS, email, WhatsApp, calls, push.
- Marketing consent is a separate, unticked choice at every signup point.
- We store the date, channel, wording and source of each consent.
- Every message names us and offers a free, easy opt-out.
- Opt-outs are applied within 24 hours across all systems.
- SMS sender names are registered and promotional SMS respects quiet hours.
- WhatsApp campaigns use approved templates and opted-in numbers only.
- Our privacy notice and records of processing describe marketing processing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need consent to send marketing SMS, email or WhatsApp in Saudi Arabia?
Generally yes. PDPL Article 25 and Implementing Regulations Article 29 require consent for direct marketing. For SMS, CST rules also require express agreement, and consent hidden in a contract or privacy policy does not count.
Can I send marketing to existing customers without asking again?
It is risky. Article 28 relaxes consent for promotional material where there is prior dealing, but Article 29 on direct marketing has no such exception. Collect a separate marketing consent and keep proof.
What must every marketing message include under the PDPL?
A clearly identified sender and a free way to opt out that is at least as easy as giving consent. SMS also needs a registered sender name with the advertising suffix.
How fast must I stop after someone opts out?
The PDPL Regulations say as soon as requested or without undue delay. CST rules for SMS and calls require stopping within 24 hours.
Is legitimate interest enough for marketing under the PDPL?
Law-firm commentary reads the marketing articles as requiring consent, so do not rely on legitimate interest for marketing messages.
Has SDAIA fined companies for marketing without consent?
Yes. Marketing without consent appears in the decisions SDAIA's committees announced in January 2026 and June 2026. Amounts were not published; the maximum is SAR 5 million per violation, doubled for repeats.
Related guides
Sources
- SDAIA — Personal Data Protection Law (Articles 25, 26, 35, 36)
- Umm Al-Qura — PDPL Implementing Regulations (Articles 11, 12, 28, 29)
- CST (CITC) — Regulations for Curbing Spam Messages and Calls (PDF)
- WhatsApp — Business Messaging Policy
- Okaz — 48 PDPL violation decisions (Jan 2026)
- Sabq — SDAIA fines and warnings (Jun 2026)
- Clyde & Co — Draft amendments to the PDPL regulations (Oct 2026)
- Al Tamimi — Public consultation on PDPL regulation amendments (2026)
- Latham & Watkins — Saudi Arabia's data protection law enters into force
This guide is general information, not legal advice. Always check the official text from the relevant authority before making decisions.